In the past, I have used the word ‘lacklustre’ to describe the labour market in Australia and this remains a fitting description.
Employment growth is well below historical averages and, recently, month on month employment change has gone negative. After digging further into ‘total employment’ growth, it’s apparent that most of the growth in total employed persons are those PT employed, not FT employed. At some point, growth in underemployment is likely to impact household income and spending. The big concern is the deterioration in FT job growth in the two key states of NSW & VIC – this is a new trend uncovered. Unemployment figures have continued to move higher and the total number of unemployed persons has now exceeded GFC highs. But one bright spot is that the rate of growth in total people unemployed has started to slow. The forward indicators mostly all suggest more of the same – a weak labour market. Stronger business confidence and slight growth in job ads may be early signs of improvement in the future.
Employment Summary (trend data)
In the month of August, total employed FT & PT all declined month on month:
Source: ABS, trend data
At the same time total unemployed persons increased by over 4k persons. Not a great combination.
The lacklustre state of the employment market is clear when you look back over the last 6 and 12 months;
Growth in PT jobs has far exceeded growth in FT jobs over both 6 and 12 month time periods
On a six month basis, the growth in total unemployed persons (+40.4k persons) has far exceeded the growth in total employed persons (+22.9k persons)
These are not indicators of a strong employment market.
Looking back over the year (Aug 13 v Aug 12), total employed persons grew by 118k persons. That sounds like a fairly reasonable number, but it is far below the ten year average of growth in total employed persons of +224k.
One positive is that there has at least been growth in PT employment. On an annual and six month basis, growth in PT jobs has helped to pick up some of the slack. This ‘swapping’ of FT for PT employment is not unusual during a slowdown in aggregate demand – which is what we have been experiencing in Australia.
Consider the chart below – the ratio of FT to PT jobs in Australia has been falling consistently since the late 70’s. Part of that is the addition of ‘new’ jobs PT in nature and more females entering the workforce in those earlier years. But it also means that FT jobs have not been growing at the same rate as PT jobs over that time. In the late 70’s there were 5.6 FT employed persons for every PT employed person – that ratio is now 2.3:1.
Looking at the same chart, but on a shorter time period (last 12 years), it’s easier to see that during the 2000’s, that the proportion of FT to PT jobs stabilised at roughly 2.5 FT employed for every one PT employed person;
That ratio dropped during the GFC and has now reached new lows of 2.3 FT employed persons for every PT employed person. In other words, some FT hours were cut back to PT hours during the GFC and haven’t reverted back to pre-GFC levels. So whilst it is good that at least there is some employment growth, at some point, this growth in PT employment will have implications for household income.
The other side of the equation is total unemployed persons. There is unfortunately no good news here either – unemployment has been trending up since early 2011.
Growth in unemployment spiked during the GFC in 2008/09 and rebounded, but remained at elevated levels (compared to pre GFC). The decline in total unemployed persons was likely in part to various stimulus measures. Consistent growth in unemployment since early 2011 has now resulted in a total number of unemployed persons higher than that of during the GFC.
If there is one bright spot here it’s that the rate of growth in total unemployed has started to slow down (the red line). Whilst that rate of growth is slowing, the last four months still saw +70k persons added each month to total unemployed. A slow-down could still be a precursor to a change in trend.
In the month of August (v same month LY), PT hours grew by +3.3% and FT hours grew by +1.4%. Commentary in the media has suggested that rising hours is a precursor to rising employment in the next few months.
We’re currently in a situation where PT employment is growing faster than FT employment (+2.8% v +0.3% yr on yr), so it makes sense that PT hours are growing faster than FT hours.
As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, there appears to be a negative correlation between FT & PT hours during slowdowns. The green circled data are the last four (4) downturns in Australia. In all of these cases, PT hours grew and FT hours declined during these downturns (not all were recessions). For a while now, I’ve been following this dataset wondering if this same trend is now playing out. But FT hours are now starting to grow faster. Does the growth in FT hours indicate future growth in FT employment? This next chart may help to answer that question – it compares the change in FT employed persons with the change in FT hours;
Since 1978, both FT hours and total FT employed persons have grown at the same time. That makes sense. So it’s unusual to see FT hours starting to grow and FT employment slowing down. There are several possible explanations;
- Employers have cut back FT employees (too much) on the expectations of weak business conditions, resulting in existing FT employees taking on a greater workload (hours). You only need to view the NAB’s Business Confidence report to see how poor business confidence has been (but saw significant improvement in the last 2 months). Or,
- Demand is picking up. Existing FT employees are taking on greater workload (hence the rising hours) because of improved business conditions – leading possibly to greater demand for employment in the future. To this point, we are seeing growth in PT employment (where most of the recent employment growth has been). If businesses are unsure of future conditions, that risk may be mitigated by hiring PT employees rather than FT staff. We have seen a significant pick-up in PMI and PSI indexes during September 2013, as well as improved consumer & business confidence leading into the election. This scenario seems plausible – low interest rates appear to be fuelling further activity in real estate and some business investment and the lower Aussie dollar has likely helped some sectors in the economy. Note that the A$ has now moved higher again as a result of the US Fed NOT tapering is QE program.
There is no definitive answer at this stage. But the state by state analysis points to a recent deterioration in FT employment growth in some key states.
State by State (trend data)
The state by state data shows two things 1) employment growth is slowing in most states (not a good thing) and 2) the growth in total unemployed persons is also slowing (a good thing).
Growth of total employed persons has slowed (annual v last 6 mths) across all major states – NSW, VIC, QLD, SA, WA & ACT.
The main areas of concern are the bigger states, specifically NSW & Vic.
NSW represents just on half of the entire National growth in total employed persons (NSW = +60k v Nat=+118k, annual). Growth in employment in NSW has been slowing down – on a 6mth basis growth is 0% and on a month on month basis, that figure is now -0.1%. Underlying these numbers are further concerns – most of the employment gains are being driven by PT employment. In NSW, of the +60k growth in total employed persons (or +1.7%) year on year, 41k of those were PT employed. In the last six months, this situation has worsened dramatically. Growth in Total persons employed was only +1.7k persons (or 0%), but underlying that was a decline in FT employed of -11k, which was offset by a rise in PT employed of +13k. At least there was PT employment to take its place.
This is what the trend in growth in FT v PT employment in NSW looks like over the last two years;
There has been a marked deterioration in FT employment growth in NSW since early 2013. This is important because NSW currently represents half of the National growth in employment.
A similar trend is also evident in Victoria which is the second biggest state in terms of contribution to National growth in employed persons (representing 24% of the National growth).
Whilst the trend in FT employment between Mar ’12 and early 2013 had been improving, that has now reversed. On an annual basis, the total number of employed persons in Vic grew by +29.6k persons. Of this total, PT employed was +30k and FT employed was -0.4k.
This is also the situation in SA, WA and ACT. Its worthwhile taking a quick look at WA given how important this state was to total employment growth only a short while ago;
The high back in 2012 of +60k growth in FT employed persons was the all-time high in WA. Clearly WA was punching above its weight in terms of employment growth versus its population size, hence why it was such an important state. Growth in both FT & PT employed is slowing/low in WA.
Only two markets are showing growth in FT employed persons – QLD and TAS.
The other side of the equation is unemployment. The news here is a little better – in the most recent six months, the rate of growth in unemployment is slowing down in all markets:
As I mentioned before, this slow-down in the rate of growth of total unemployed persons is a good thing. Whilst the slow-down is significant in most cases, note that unemployment is still growing. Just for context, in NSW that rate growth in total unemployed persons has slowed from 15% annual to 8% over the last six months. Thankfully that has slowed further in the month on month figures to only +1.2%, but note in the chart below, that the actual number is still on its highs (+29k Aug ’13 v Aug ’12).
The state by state trends also shows some encouraging signs;
WA, QLD & ACT are now in a down trend and WA & ACT actually recorded a decline in unemployed persons Aug v July. The latest month on month data also has the rate of growth slowing across most markets.
Putting this all together, employment growth is slowing, but unemployment growth has also started slowing;
In all, this is a very weak labour market and unless there is stronger growth in FT employment, this may place further pressure on household income and spending.
The question now is whether there are any indications of a change on the horizon?
There are a number of indicators that can provide some insight as to future changes in employment – job ads, vacancies, hiring intentions and business confidence.
ANZ Job Ads
Analysis by the ABS in 2002 suggested that the ANZ job ad series leads troughs in the labour market by zero to two quarters. In Sept, job ads rose 2% month on month (compared to a fall of 2% in the prior month).
Looking at the trend in growth, it appears that the rate of decline in job ads has slowed down. Job ads are approx. 20% below the same time last year though and this still suggests a very soft labour market. Whilst this data isn’t pointing to an improvement in labour market conditions, it’s not pointing to a further deterioration either.
ABS – Job Vacancies (6354.01)
In this series, a ‘job vacancy’ is defined as “a job available for immediate filling on the survey reference date and for which recruitment action has been taken.” (Source: ABS). This data point indicates continued weakness in the labour market – the rate of decline is -20% (year on year) and does not look to be slowing down at this stage.
Hudson Hiring Intentions – Q3 2013
The Hudson Hiring Intentions survey (permanent staff) points to continued weakness in labour market conditions. Interestingly, it seems to reflect the current status of the labour market quite well;
NAB – Business Confidence
I think it’s also worthwhile considering the role of business confidence as a possible forward indicator of labour market conditions. In the latest month (Sept 2013), business confidence continued its somewhat strong upward trend. According to the NAB survey this is the result of recent strengthening in asset prices aided by lower interest rates and better consumer sentiment. “Fundamentally, however, it appears to reflect a reaction to the political change”. This seems to be a common theme in recent data series, so it will be interesting to see if this rise in confidence a) continues and b) results in better business conditions.
The two most important points from the survey report were:
From the NAB Sept Report: